Leadership in Business Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Leadership in Business - Essay Example According to the research findings, it can, therefore, be said that the high competition in the business world nowadays needs competitive business leaders who will manage to organize their business organizations to achieve their goals. Business leaders need several characteristics in order to achieve their goals. Risk taking is doing something hoping for any outcome, be it good or bad. Any competitive business leader must be ready to take risks. Starting a business involves depositing money or capital where you are not certain whether you will get profit or not. It involves one asking themselves many questions like, â€Å"should I start a business, or should I not?†, â€Å"Should I employ new workers or not?† and many others. Those people who take risks in business will emerge successful, given the high competition in the business world. A business leader who fears to take risks cannot succeed in business because they will fear to get to losses. A good example of an ent repreneur is Amazon’s CEO, Jeff Bezos. Amazon is an organization that deals with the internet business. The CEO says it is good to take risks to manage a business, but it is also good to reduce the risks as the business grows. He says he had to think whether to build Amazon or continue with his previous job on Wall Street. He risked leaving his job to start Amazon, but he succeeded in his online business. Therefore taking risks is always important for success in a business. Another successful business leader, Sir Richard Branson, CEO of Virgin Group (A group of companies in the United States), says, â€Å"Great success does not come without taking risks†. The most important thing is taking the right risks.

Greek Parthenon Architect Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Greek Parthenon Architect - Essay Example How the work is significant for the period in which it was created. It should be remembered that Greek religious society has anciently been controlled by gods. This magnificent construction was dedication to the Greek goddess Athena, and was completed in 438 BC. In those days, there was ancient believe that gods were to be offered sacred place. Again, it is prudent to consider that the development of the artifact was significant in emancipation of the Doric order. In this case, the Doric order is the magnificent facet of the building which in this case had flat pavements and with a base and vertical shafts. The nature of this building was used either for political or religious reasons (Mikalson, 44). In itself it was a symbol and facet of power. How the work perhaps challenges the conventions associated with the period. It is scholarly good to note that the Parthenon was a politically backed religious presentation. In this case, the Greek society held a powerful convention which had close similarities to this period. In light with this, attention is garnered towards realization of the Greek political nature alongside other effects. One of the prominent conventions of the time is Chronology. This classical Antiquity (c. 1200 – c. 800 BC), was geometric styles and proto-geometric designs applied in Architecture. This convention was substantial in the beginning of the Orientalizing influence which was initial stage of the end of dark ages. Based on this presumption, it is good to relate the Parthenon as an elucidator to the much common culture of modern artistic period. What are the main concerns of the artist/creator or architect? As analyzed in the above description, it is coherent to note that the architecture was more interested with elegance. The desire to retain the Doric order was substantive in improving the quality of the design. Firstly, it is imperative to consider that architecture was interested in attempting to establish the rules of harmony. The engineering concept focused in methods to change stones into cube in order to provide full support architrave load at the last column. This method was called the broader corner triglyph. However, it is prudent to understand this method was not satisfying in any event, engineers required to strengthen the corners more as this would withstand pressure. Therefore, in design, the architect was obliged to relate the two further corners together to form cohesion. What are some of the challenges the artist/creator or architect faced? It should be understood that engineering works attracted a significant challenge in relation to the aspect of suspension and comprehension. Firstly, in consideration that the building was done purely by stone block is a significance fact that attracted attention on the security of the building. Primarily, strengthening of the corners was a close consideration based on the fact that corners were to be classically oriented to provide solution about the chall enges of weather and time. To solve this architectural hiccup, the corners were terminated using Triglyph (Curlee, 21). Another significant challenge considered by architecture was the elevation. This was the subdivision of columns, entablature and crepidorma structures. Harmonizing these three considerations without technical aspects; for instance, cement always proved a technical hurdle for designers. In particular, the